Not automatically. Falling on someone else’s property does not by itself make them liable in Louisiana. The law sets a specific test, and it is stricter than most people expect.
What Louisiana actually requires you to prove
Claims against a merchant are governed by La. R.S. 9:2800.6. On top of everything else in an ordinary negligence case, it puts three things on you:
- The condition presented an unreasonable risk of harm, and that risk was reasonably foreseeable.
- The merchant created the condition, or had actual or constructive notice of it, before the fall.
- The merchant failed to exercise reasonable care.
All three. Miss one and the claim fails, however badly you were hurt.
The second element is where these cases are won and lost
It is not enough that a spill existed. The question is whether the store knew, or should have known, and that turns on one thing: how long it had been there.
The statute defines constructive notice as proof that “the condition existed for such a period of time that it would have been discovered if the merchant had exercised reasonable care.” In plain terms, a puddle that appeared thirty seconds before you walked through it is very different from one that sat for an hour while staff walked past.
There is a trap in that second part. Louisiana says the presence of an employee near the hazard does not by itself establish notice, unless it is shown the employee knew or should have known about it. So “there was a worker standing right there” is not the argument people assume it is.
Two things that surprise people
No cleaning schedule is not automatically a win. The statute says the absence of a written or verbal uniform cleanup or safety procedure is insufficient, on its own, to prove failure to exercise reasonable care. It matters, but it is not the whole case.
Being partly at fault does not end the claim, unless your share reaches 51 percent. Louisiana uses modified comparative fault, so if you were looking at your phone, that reduces what you recover rather than barring it, as long as your share stays below 51 percent. For falls on or after 1 January 2026, a person found 51 percent or more at fault recovers nothing (La. C.C. art. 2323, as amended by Acts 2025, No. 15). Insurers routinely assign more fault to the injured person than the evidence supports, and that threshold is exactly why it matters.
Why time matters so much here
The evidence that proves how long the hazard sat there has the shortest life of any evidence in injury law. Surveillance video is usually overwritten within days or weeks. Incident reports are filed internally and not volunteered. Cleaning and inspection logs, the exact record of whether anyone was checking, are routine documents nobody preserves specially unless asked. Employees move on.
A letter demanding preservation of the video and the logs, sent in the first days, changes what the case looks like a year later. Sent after the video is gone, it changes nothing. We have set out what evidence helps prove a Louisiana store fall in more detail.
How long do I have?
In Louisiana you generally have two years from the date of the fall to file suit, for an injury on or after July 1, 2024. Some situations change that, so have your own date checked rather than assume.
Ask a Lafayette firm whether you have a case
We handle slip and fall and premises liability claims across Acadiana. The consultation is free. No fee unless we win.
Call (337) 347-7177.